Passover…And Cutting US Military Aid to Israel
(note: 10 billboards are going up in Albuquerque New Mexico. They read `Stop US Military Aid To Israel’ . I have not figured out how to post the picture yet…will work on it later today. )
1. Passover
A few days ago my family and I celebrated Passover with friends in Denver. I don’t celebrate it often anymore – haven’t in years. Generally not interested in anything with a non-secular tinge. But it was quite nice, tasteful, the reading of the Hagaddah humane and the company wonderful. While most of the 35 or so people present were Jewish, some were, like myself, not religious. There was also a Palestinian family at the table. As we broke matzoh as a part of the story-telling, my Palestinian friend and I had different memories.
Israel on Trial
Op Ed by George Bisharet in today’s New York Times
(Note: During Israel’s war in Gaza – it wasn’t really a war, more of simply a turkey shoot, a slaughter – I wrote an op ed which somehow got published in two Colorado newspapers (Boulder Daily Camera, now-defunct Rocky Mountain News) stating the obvious: that Israel was committing war crimes in Gaza and doing so both with impunity and the full support of the Bush Administration. Then Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice was more or less cheering on the effort and as was the little idiot from Texas. Nor was there virtually any attempt to criticize the Gaza operation by then President-elect Barack Obama or his entourage. In the midst of the fighting reports appeared in the European press that the Bush Administration was looking for ways to ship yet more arms to Israel (Reuters – Jan 13, 2009).
Since the end of the war, the war crimes charges have multiplied, Israel’s attempt to paint its army as `the most humane military in the world’ have fallen flat, Israeli officers have been warned not to travel in certrain countries for fear of indictments on war crimes and Israel’s p.r. effort to justify the war – other than here in the US – has generally failed. Of course the Colorado state senate in its usual foreign policy wisdom, following the lead of the US Congress – passed its usual dumb and one-sided resolution supporting Israel.
Rather than `going away’ – the global criticism of Israel in Gaza is getting louder, so much so that even the New York Times, in an effort to show it is capable of showing `both sides’ of the conflict, felt a need to give space to an op ed in today’s paper by George Bisharet accusing Israel of war crimes. Of course it appears in the far less read Saturday edition of the paper and not Sunday’s bigger one. Still, it is an indication of the degree to which – now nearly three months later – even public opinion in this country has turned on the issue – rjp)
____________
Israel on Trial
By GEORGE BISHARAT
San Francisco
CHILLING testimony by Israeli soldiers substantiates charges that Israel’s Gaza Strip assault entailed grave violations of international law. The emergence of a predominantly right-wing, nationalist government in Israel suggests that there may be more violations to come. Hamas’s indiscriminate rocket attacks on Israeli civilians also constituted war crimes, but do not excuse Israel’s transgressions. While Israel disputes some of the soldiers’ accounts, the evidence suggests that Israel committed the following six offenses:
Ron Forthofer Responds To Yesterday’s Post
Note – I don’t disagree with Ron’s comments about the Israeli Labor Party but I do think that the US factor is somewhere involved here. RJP
This from him:
Thanks for sharing.
I guess I disagree with your conclusion that Netanyahu’s election was in response to Obama’s victory. From my reading of the Israeli press and other analysis of it, I thought Netanyahu had been well ahead in the polls for quite some time, even before Obama was a serious candidate. I think after the Lebanon debacle, it was almost a foregone conclusion that Bibi was going to be the next prime minister. The only blip in this outlook occurred last Fall when Livni had the opportunity to form a government. If she had given in to Shas, she probably could have formed a government. If this had occurred, that may have helped her even more in the election. If my memory is correct though, she actually did receive more votes than Bibi, but Peres realized that she couldn’t form a government since the extreme right received such support. Therefore, he turned to Bibi. So I don’t think his selection was necessarily a reaction to Obama. In reality, I think that Labor long ago committed suicide, setting the stage for the right to come to power. Labor has been a disaster for so long and has almost no credibililty that Israeli voters really had few choices. I don’t recall seeing what the turnout was. I assume that it was pretty low and, if this is correct, it made it easier for the dedicated right wingers to win.
note – much of what I write about below comes after discussions with a number of young Jewish friends, social activists in general, but also active in Denver’s Jewish Community…
Despite appearances, all is not well in Denver’s Jewish Community.
Yet on the surface things couldn’t be better.
– Its more prominent members continue play a key role in local politics, business and the leadership of the Democratic Party, highlighted by the role of certain of its members, Steve Farber in particular, to bring the Democratic Party Convention which propelled Barack Obama to the presidency, to Denver.
– Its major organizations – AIPAC, ADL, the Jewish Community Relations Board, the Jewish Community Center, the Rose Foundation – remain active if not vibrant in certain ways and are able to raise dramatic amounts of money as a recent $10,000 a plate brunch for AIPAC suggests. As it does annually, the ADL will host a spring brunch, this time honoring the state’s governor. Much of the political class in Colorado will attend.
– Once again, as it has consistently done since the 1967 War, the Jewish Community, for the most part, stood by Israel and defended – against all objective logic – its military operation in Gaza as `defensive’
Under The Surface, Hints of Malaise
Under the surface, however, there are growing hints of malaise…
The Changing Israel Debate…Even in Colorado 2
Note: Perhaps I spoke too soon when I wrote about the changing attitude towards Israel in the US? It’s not like AIPAC has quite folded up shop. As Israel’s credibility sours after the war against Gaza, in fact, such organizations are redoubling their efforts. It’s not just little pipsqueaks (like me) who have run afoul and are in their sights. Look what happened to Charles W. Freeman Jr.,who nominated for a top intelligence post by the director of national intelligence and forced to withdraw under intense pressure? His appointment did not survive an AIPAC-directed campaign to topple him.
Below is an article sent me by Bob Ross – executive director of the double bass repair lobby in Congress – and a good personal friend. If the double bass lobby joins forces with the even more powerful `senior university lecturer’ lobby – well, watch out AIPAC! The article appeared in yesterday’s New York Times. There is also apparently a piece by Freeman that appeared in the Wall Street Journal being circulated by Bob Kinsey, former Green Party candidate for US Senate here in Colorado.
AIPAC might have brought down Freeman – no doubt they did – but not without receiving collateral damage itself. The tone of the different articles suggests a growing impatience and anger with these little (in this case `not-so-little’) jihads against any and all who are critical of Israel. Those who blandly and blindly put Israel’s interests before those of the United States are finding that their arguments are wearing thin. Think about it – Stephen Rosen, a former AIPAC higher-up, who started the ball rolling against Freeman with a critical piece in his blog, was indicted for passing US intelligence secrets about Iran to Israel. Even from his disgraced position he still has the influence to bring down a senior US diplomat like Freeman! I wonder how much longer these kind of McCarthyite tactics will work? Read more…
The Changing Israel Debate…Even in Colorado
For starters, I would like thank the many people who have offered to come to my assistance in the case that my job at the University of Denver might be in jeapordy for having – most recently – publicly criticized Israel’s war in Gaza. These offers came both from within the university and beyond, including friends in the Jewish Community. I told them to `hold their fire’ so to speak for now. From what I can tell, the mini-jihad against my dean, Tom Farer and myself at the Korbel School of International Studies, went nowhere. Of course I could be wrong about this but it seems the effort has fizzled, at least temporarily. You should also know that another faculty member, Randall Kuhn, had a fine piece on Gaza published in the Washington Times. Kuhn’s piece can be found on the January 14, 2009 entry for this blog, although it means scrolling down a bit to get to it. I was told that after it appeared calls that Kuhn too be fired, were also made.
This kind of bullying, which has become so common place, did not seem to have produced any results this time. A sign of the times? That said, there are indications, albeit modest, that the debate over Israel-Palestine is at long last starting to shift somewhat nationally. Glenn Greewald’s blog entry printed just below – lifted from Salon.com – gives a good sense of the new environment. Add to this the Hampshire College decision to divest from companies profiting off the Occupation of the Palestinian Territories (W. Bank and Gaza), Britain’s decision to open negotiations with Hezbollah, global calls to indict those Israelis responsible for the carnage in Gaza of war crimes, the likely critical posture that the Durban Conference on Racism will take towards Israel and it does seem, at long last, that a shift in thinking – modest to be sure – but still, is taking place. Of course we can expect a full court press – already initiated by Deshowitz, Foxman and the like – to counter the Hampshire divestment with their calls for the US to divest from Iran, etc, etc…
Thanks to Alan Gilbert for having pointed out the Greenwald comments.
Charles Freeman, Roger Cohen and the changing Israel debate
The right-wing, Israel-centric stranglehold over our political debates is clearly eroding.
Glenn Greenwald
Mar. 09, 2009 |
(updated below – Update II)
Anyone who doubts that there has been a substantial — and very positive — change in the rules for discussing American policy towards Israel should consider two recent episodes: (1) the last three New York Times columns by Roger Cohen; and (2) the very strong pushback from a diverse range of sources against the neoconservative lynch mob trying, in typical fashion, to smear and destroy Charles Freeman due to his critical (in all senses of the word) views of American policy towards Israel. One positive aspect of the wreckage left by the Bush presidency is that many of the most sacred Beltway pieties stand exposed as intolerable failures, prominently including our self-destructively blind enabling of virtually all Israeli actions.
For the full piece please click here.
Guadeloupe: Out of Sight But Not Out Of Mind
Good background piece on the disturbances/uprising on the French Caribbean Island. The fear – as is mentioned – in numerous articles is `contagion’…ie that the anger and demonstrations will spread elsewhere in the French overseas territories and ultimately to metropolitan France where a general strike is planned for March 19.
These events are symbolic of the times. As the economic crisis deepens its impact on the world’s economic periphery will be even more tragic than it is among the core countries. I’m hearing reports from India, of new millions thrown out of work – migrant workers with nowhere to go – much like China.
Concerning this piece on Guadeloupe – like in much of the Caribbean, just beneath the surface…there is too much blood in the soil and on occasion the ghosts of past massacres mix with their living real and spiritual descendants as they seem to be doing now in Guadeloupe. Powerful combination. Read more…
1. British Medical Journal `The Lancet’ To Publish Findings on Human Consequences of Israeli Invasion on Gaza
Thanks to Irving Greenbaum of Boulder for alerting me to this. Doubt such findings would appear in the Intermountain Jewish News. Too bad. I’d be curious to see if they could justify Israel’s war in Gaza as `defensive’.
On 5 March 2009, a series on Palestinian health under occupation will be published by the highly-regarded scientific medical and public health journal, The Lancet. Although access to the journal is free, one must register first (http://www.thelancet.com/series/). I’ll cover the series in The Lancet as it unfolds.
Last month, The Lancet released the preliminary findings of two clinicians from the UK, Dr Ghassan Abu Sittah and Dr Swee Ang who had managed to get into Gaza during the Israeli invasion. (click here to read the preliminary findings). Their findings reveal an atrocity greater than any image can possibly convey and are a shocking revelation of just what was used by Israel in those fateful 22 days of precision bombing on Gaza. While there is plenty of evidence that white phosphorous was used, both doctors believe that the massive liver necrosis seen in patients cannot have been caused by white phosphorous alone. Furthermore, there is a real likelihood of toxic fumes from the white phosphorous residues that litter the entire Gaza Strip contaminating the air once it rains. They also found evidence of Tungsten DIME which truncates peoples’ limbs without bleeding and the possibility of experimental weapons like the silent bombs that vaporise everything and everyone in the vicinity of where they explode. The use of such weapons would constitute crimes against humanity not seen since Agent Orange was used by the US during its war on Vietnam. These weapons do not just kill and maim people, but their effects are felt in the bodies of survivors and the environment long after the attacks have ceased with no known end time. Israel’s targeting of Palestinians with such weapons is certainly contrary to the Geneva Convention, but also contrary to how we would expect a civilised army to behave, let alone the whole moral issue of subjecting any people to such atrocities.
There are calls now, and actions being taken around the world, for prosecuting Israeli officials for war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide. Already lawyers in France, Spain, Belgium, Turkey, Jordan and Lebanon as well as international organisations are beginning to file complaints against Israeli officials. Amongst the names submitted to the International Criminal Court in the Hague to stand trial are Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, Defense Minister Ehud Barak, Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni, Internal Security Minister Avi Dichter, Deputy Defense Minister Matan Vilnai and IDF Chief of Staff Gabi Ashkenazi, Minister Binyamin Ben-Eliezer, former IDF Chiefs of Staff Moshe Yaalon and Dan Halutz, former GOC Southern Command Doron Almog, former National Security Council Head Giora Eiland and Brigadier-General (Res.) Mike Herzog. US international law expert Francis Boyle has called for an Israeli War Crimes Tribunal (ICT) and has asked the UN General Assembly to “immediately establish an (ICTI) as a ‘subsidiary organ’ under UN Charter Article 22” similar to the Security Council’s ICTY for Yugoslavia. Its purpose “would be to investigate and prosecute Israeli war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide against the Peoples of Lebanon and Palestine.” Legal proceedings are also being brought against the UK government over a breach of legal obligations in relation to the Occupied Palestinian Territory. As the evidence mounts, more petitions are likely to be filed.
A fact-finding mission of the League of Arab Nations to investigate war crimes committed by Israel has just concluded. It consisted of 6 international experts, including John Dugard, former UN Rapporteur for the Occupied Palestinian Territories, and it has gathered evidence and eyewitnesses’ testimonies for a report that will be submitted to the League.
2. Avigail Abarbanel’s Website
A new website by an Israeli ex-pat living in UK. Worth reading. (click here)
I am unfamiliar with her writing but she seems to know what she is talking about. Her insights about Israeli society (and its military) correspond to what other friends have been telling me who have been to Israeli recently. Again – thanks Irving G.
3. Arnie’s Saga
I remain fascinated with Arnie Zaler’s journey from SDS radical to Colorado’s mini-Madoff. True he only scammed somewhere between $20-25 million – a mere pittance compared to the great one – Madoff – but in no ways pocket change either. Have discussed it with several other friends who are also taken by the story. The result is that I’ve added a few touches here and there to the `Arnie’s Saga’ below. Has gotten me thinking of those days more than I have for some time. It is not so much that I am thinking of him personally. More specifically, I am remembering – or trying to remember – the evolution of the peace movement (mostly around Vietnam, the development of the Chicano and Native American movements in those days) and Zaler’s relationship with the Jewish Community throughout the decades.
What comes through is something like this…
A CU chapter developed in the late sixties under the leadership of John Buttney and Bruce Goldberg. There were others – a good dozen others that I knew and they will excuse me for not mentioning them by name. The SDS chapter split between those who went along with the Weathermen, including Buttney and those who didn’t, including Goldberg. But by the fall of 1969 – when I entered graduate school at CU – the organization had lost its way. Zaler splits rather than wear the leadership mantel, too heavy for him to support. There was still an SDS chapter and members, but they never got it together. Into that vacuum came two organizations – the Student Peace Union, in which CU student body president Pat Stimer was a key player, and the Student Mobilization Committee – the SWP (Socialist Workers Party) front organization. There was a certain tension between these two but they were, together, key in the anti war activities that continued and built during the next academic year culminating in the student occupation of the Administration Building (which led to the calling out of the Colorado National Guard) in April and the complete closing of the campus – in response to the massive student mobilization accompanying the US invasion of Cambodia in late April – early May of 1970. An anti-war demonstration on the campus the first days of May – if I remember correctly – brought out 15000 students and faculty, one of the largest political demonstrations in the university’s history. There was a similar upsurge at the University of Denver in those days – where students constructed a Tent City – on the site of what is now the library – only to have it dismantled by the Colorado National Guard – which was very busy in those years countering student activism.
After that, the anti-war movement on the campus ebbed some although it remained active until the war’s end some five years later. SDS never recovered though. By 1971-1972 – for those of us who didn’t have girl friends or boy friends with rich fathers – the discussion had shifted to which left group different activists would join…
Arnie’s Saga (2)
Note: I’ve received two emails with more details about Arnie Zaler, which I reprint here in full, both from people who knew him in his SDS days at the University of Colorado in Boulder, Jay Jurie and Paul Roasburry.
I inclued their comments below.
Arnie’s Saga
1.
Arnie Zaler sits in a federal prison in Atlanta, waiting extradition back to Colorado sometime in the near future. A number of news agencies reported yesterday how Zaler was `met’ stepping off a plane from Tel Aviv in Atlanta by FBI and State Department representatives. Zaler, referred to as a `fugitive businessman’ was promptly arrested. Two (un-named) sources in Israel informed the Rocky Mountain News in recent weeks that they had been scammed by Zaler, the last in a long line of such victims. Not likely to happen again as I would expect that Arnie Zaler is going to spend a good portion of the rest of his life in prison.
Why am in interested in Zaler enough to write about him?
Guadeloupe…`They (the French) Want Beirut; They’ve Got Beirut’
As of this writing, the French island of Guadeloupe in the Caribbean appears to be in full revolt. Violent protests erupted against high prices and low wages there. Rioting broke out throughout the island several days ago and yesterday, one Jacques Bino, described in the mainstream press as `a union activist’ in his 50s’ became the first casualty. A number of police have been injured too, wounded in the crossfire. Bino was shot to death next to a roadblock set up by protesters, where armed youth and the police had exchanged gunfire. Local political leaders worry that the situation is spiraling out of control.
Negotiations with the French government did take place but then broke down, only increasing the frustrations and tensions. By last week the island, known as yet another one of those idyllic Caribbean retreats, was transformed into something approaching a war zone. There has been a wave of property damage – cars overturned, rock throwing, and dozens of other incidents. Earlier in the week, protesters set buildings and cars on fire, looted shops, smashed storefront windows and clashed with police in Point-a-Pitre and at least two other towns.
Tom Bernard: Another Friend Dies…
One of my daughters, Abbie, commented recently that so many of my stories end in death. It’s not that I’m a pessimist, just a little sad. But then, that’s how it ends, doesn’t it? And then we pass the baton. These days friends and companeros of old seem to be exiting the scene in great numbers. We’re supposed to live into our late 70s, early 80s, not leaving in our mid or late fifties. Ah but as a great sage frequently said …`you make a plan for life (or death) and then life (or death) makes a plan for you.
Mostly, like Tom Bernard, I haven’t seen them in years. And yet I feel cheated, almost betrayed, that they are leaving me now to face the future without them even though they’re no longer a part of my daily life and haven’t been for years. Still there was something soothing in knowing simply that they are out there SOMEWHERE, wherever…doing good deeds. And when I read or hear how another one has slipped away, I cannot begin to explain the degree to which it saddens me and makes me feel just a little bit lonelier. And all I can do is write a few insipid words acknowledging their passing, words that do not do justice to the richness and generosity of spirit of their lives.
And here’s another one, I guess, Abbie.
I learned about a month ago of the death of Tom Bernard – who spent a fair part of his adult life here in Denver (70s and 80s) before moving on to the great Northwest. For a good part of the time when my family lived in Finland in the late 1980s, Tom managed the affairs of our house, helping our dear lawyer and friend Rudy Schware with the chore.
I knew him pretty well – the left in Denver was never that big and leftists working in the labor movement few and far between. Leftists working effectively in the labor movement were even rarer. Tom’s life as an organizer touched two great social movements of our time – the movement against the war in Vietnam and the labor movement. Tom was a key player in both – and in both – he played hard ball so to speak and the work he did was dangerous and required great courage and skill. He had both qualities. Tom organized units of the military intelligence detachment he worked with (flying AWACs) to go on strike against the US invasion of Cambodia. He was lucky to come out of that 1. alive 2. without serving much time in prison. His experiences as anti war activist within the military are touched upon in `Sir, No Sir‘ , a dvd about anti-war organizing by the soldiers, sailors and air men who fought the war in Vietnam and opposed it. Theirs was a much harder and more dangerous form of activism than that of civilians marching and protesting in this country’s streets. It is a pretty powerful dvd. He continued organizing serving military folk here in Denver where, with a group of intrepid ex-military friends he organized both in Denver and in Colorado Springs.
When I knew him, he went from job to job, and in one of those jobs – with UPS – he joined the Teamsters’ Union. It was as corrupt a union as this country has ever produced by the time Tom got involved. Reforming it, democratizing it was not the stuff for people with weak stomachs. But he was a part of that movement that actually cleaned up the union from within and cleansed its leadership. One easily lose one’s life pursuing such noble goals and how close he came to being offed by union hired goons is a story yet to be told – and I hope one of my friends, closer to the action than myself – will someday tell the tale.
He was some kind of socialist – if I remember right he was with the International Socialists…whatever. `In the struggle’ – as we used to refer to our social movements…we were on the same team. It makes me sick to think of all the hair splitting differences – most of them profoundly irrelevant – that separated us.
Of course it’s impossible to measure such things, but a few of us old codgers – talking about Bernard’s passing – rated him as among the best left organizers – if not THE best – of our era. He was extraordinary, nothing less. He set a very high standard…and his relatives came from Malta and he studied a year at Cornell!
May he rest in peace.
Below are two obituaries written about him, the first from The Oregonian, the second from one of the producers (I believe) of Sir! No Sir
1. Obituary in The Oregonian
Somewhere, maybe in Vietnam, Tom Bernard learned to turn his innate gift for gab into the art of making true connections with people. It served Tom well in all he did, as a spy in Vietnam, as an anti-war activist, as a union reformer and organizer, as a husband, father, grandfather and friend.
Tom’s talent for talking came early. He was born into a large, extended, multilingual family in Michigan. Every Sunday was spent with his Maltese grandparents enjoying large dinners such as baked ziti or stuffed artichokes, the adults eating upstairs, the children in the basement. After dinner, the neighbors came over, rugs were rolled up for dancing, and his grandfather Romeo Bernardo served everyone his homemade apricot brandy.
Tom went to Catholic schools, was an altar boy, took 12 years of Latin and attended Cornell University. It was the late 1960s, war was raging in Vietnam and the specter of the draft stalked him. After a little more than a year at Cornell, he decided to enlist in the Air Force before he was drafted into the Army.
His father had served in World War II, and his grandfather had earned his citizenship by serving in World War I.
Tom scored so well on the language tests that he was sent to El Paso, Texas, to learn Vietnamese. For two years, he flew over Vietnam, encapsulated in a C-131, listening in on and translating Viet Cong broadcast conversations. When their planes were detected, the pilots went into an immediate, terrifying nose dive to escape under the radar.
Later, he sometimes jokingly summarized the years as, “There was always plenty of cigarettes and plenty of marijuana.” But the truth was uglier. He saw and heard things that changed him. He said the translators got to recognize the voices they were listening to. Knowing firsthand how civilian centers were targeted and hospitals were being bombed, he said, he and others decided to dedicate themselves to ending what they viewed was a criminal war. He helped create WORMS (We Openly Resist Military Stupidity).
The first thing he did back in the States was to make an appointment with his congressman about the war.
Then, he joined a friend in Denver and worked with the Pacific Counseling Service. He became a member of Vietnam Veterans Against the War. He was director of the Colorado Peace Network and of the Draft and Military Counseling Center. He demonstrated, organized and lectured. He was sent to Japan and Thailand to counsel GIs and to help them get out of the military. He could talk to the GIs; he took time to find connections that encouraged people to open their hearts to him.
After the war, he returned to Denver and took a job as a UPS driver. Quickly and inevitably, he became active in the Teamsters Union. He was elected an officer and then became a founding member of Upsurge, a Teamster reform organization. It was a rough-and-tumble era of Teamster politics, and Tom was in the thick of it all. Organized crime had infiltrated the union and didn’t want to give up its power. Tom was beaten up, a bomb was planted in the exhaust pipe of his car (it was a botched job and fizzled out), and the FBI knocked on his door to tell him to be careful, that he was on a Teamster hit list.
He lost his job at one point when charges were leveled against him (they were later rescinded), and he spent a year delivering newspapers in the morning and pizzas at night. He was reinstated and rose up the ladder in union work.
At a union conference in Vancouver, B.C., he met Helen Lee, who was then director of Evergreen State College Labor Education Center. They fell in love, and he moved to Olympia with her. They later lived in Oakland, Calif., before moving to Portland in 2005.
Tom and Helen were hired by Local 5017, the Oregon Federation of Nurses and Health Professionals, she as an external organizer, he as an internal organizer.
He came with more than 200 contract negotiations under his belt and a year ago negotiated the contract for registered nurses at Providence Milwaukie Medical Center.
He took to Portland like a born duck. He always loved food and immediately found Esparza’s, Pok Pok and Bob’s Red Mill. Soon, he knew every good restaurant in Portland and loved surprising the staffs of Vietnamese and Thai restaurants by speaking to them in their native tongues.
He had given up smoking in 1991, and after a heart attack in 1993, he changed his diet and tried to keep his weight down. It was a struggle. He joined Bally and 24-Hour Fitness but wasn’t exactly a regular at either.
He was an inveterate sports fan, loyal to the teams of any city he lived in and was soon cheering on the Trail Blazers.
He worked fervently on the Obama campaign and became interested in the plight of the homeless in Portland. He hung out at Sisters of the Road Cafe. In a short time, he amassed a large group of friends from all facets of Portland life. Sometimes, he would tease them, talking to them in a Donald Duck voice or in pretend foreign languages. But always, he listened first, and whether it was sports or food or grandchildren, he always found a common bond.
Tom died suddenly Dec. 27, 2008, in the holiday snow, of another heart attack.
His friends and family gathered at the Clinton Street Theater to honor him. People came from across the country. They were all close to Tom; he had taken the time
2. Tribute to Tom Bernard from Dick Zeigler of Sir! No Sir
I met Tom while filming Sir! No Sir! in what I later learned was a typical “Tom” way. I’ll never forget the email I got out of the blue from this guy I had never heard of, telling me simply that he had been part of an extremely significant group that had to be part of this film. They had never told their story publicly, and in fact had been threatened with prosecution for treason if they ever did. I was certainly intrigued, and soon Tom and I were friends.
Several months and a couple of failed attempts later, I found myself in a house with Tom and three other courageous, exemplary members of the WORMS–We Openly Resist Military Stupidity.
One of the most thrilling aspects of the GI Movement during the Vietnam War was its ubiquitous nature. In every corner of the military, everywhere on the planet, GIs found creative, stunning ways to rebel. Even if no one outside their individual unit knew they existed, they became part of an elegant tapestry of chaos and resistance.
And none were more elegant than the WORMS. Trained in Vietnamese, they were part of an ultra-secret unit that flew over North Vietnam intercepting communications from the “enemy,” and translating them for the Pentagon to use in planning military strategy. As Tom described it to me, they began developing an almost personal relationship with the voices they were hearing, and soon knew that the real “enemy” was not the people they were listening to, but their own bosses. Knowing firsthand how civilian centers were targeted and hospitals were being bombed, they decided to dedicate their lives toward ending that criminal war.
As they told me their story, the depth of their humanity and courage shown through–and I knew Tom had not exaggerated their significance. Finding themselves in a critical position for the war effort, they developed creative, challenging, fun(that was a requirement!), and profoundly effective ways of resisting. Their impact was far greater than they or anyone else knew.
I don’t know much about Tom’s life after Vietnam, but I do know that–as is true for thousands–those years as a GI resister informed all of it. I know that he never gave up his determination to change the world and his sense of purpose that was born with the WORMS.
My heart goes out to his wonderful wife, Helen, and their family. I will never forget Tom, and am very grateful to have known him the brief time I did.
Letters to the Intermountain Jewish News: Re – Farer and Prince
Note: I enclose copies of letters sent to the Intermountain Jewish News in response to a letter to the editor by Dick Wisott labeling Dean Tom Farer and myself anti-Israel and `Israel bashers’. (see below). Don’t know if the paper will print them. I thank those who took the time to respond. rjp
Dean Tom Farer and Rob Prince Attacked as `Israel Bashers’ and `anti-Israel’ in the Intermountain Jewish News
Note: I’ve been criticized, attacked before in the media – but never in the same breath as my dean, Tom Farer. The comments came in a letter to the editor in the new issue of the Intermountain Jewish News. A letter to the editor appeared in the paper’s most recent edition written by one Dick Wisott, entitled `Beware of Anti-Israel Professors At DU’. Dean Farer and myself are featured. Together! It has not (yet) appeared in the on-line version, but it is there in the printed version of the last issue which some friends received yesterday in the mail. Compared to some, it’s pretty mild, old hat kind of criticisms – and to give the writer (don’t know him) credit – he got his quotes from our op eds accurately enough.
My first impression is that that criticism was written by someone who attended a panel discussion at the Korbel School held on January 22 in which Dean Farer, Dr. Josef Szyliowicz and myself – all Jewish it turns out – participated. While there were some disagreements about the role of oil in US Middle East Policy and the failure or lack there of the Bush Administration’s `War on Terrorism’, all three of us showed some level of support for the Saudi Peace Proposal as a basis for moving forward and resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. There was one man in the audience, looked to be about my age, dressed informally (blue jeans), longish hair, but seemed uncomfortable and took alot of notes. Don’t know if it was Wisott – and if it was, that is fine…glad he was in attendance actually. I wish there were more like him in the audience.
